Saturday, June 30, 2007
Attorney fees requires agency relationship
The Michigan Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals' award of attorneys fees to the in pro per attorney under the Open Meetings Act in Omdahl v. West Iron Board of Education. The Open Meetings Act allows the recovery of "actual attorney fees." The Court reasoned that an "attorney" implies an agency an agency relationship with another person or entity. Therefore, to obtain attorney fees under the Act, the attorney has to represent another, and not himself. The majority opinion did not analyze whether the attorney fees were actually incurred.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
What if the lawyer in question was represented by a PLLC of which he was the sole member, which employed only himself. In that case, there would be agency. Could "actual attorneys fees" be recovered then?
I am pretty sure that in Omdahl, the attorney was working through his firm, like your hypo poses.
Post a Comment